What Makes a Real Estate Description “Legal”?

Real Estate Legal Descriptions - Details to watch for

The real estate closing is imminent but the title company calls and says there is a question about the legal description. How could that happen?

The legal description of the land is obviously one of the most important elements of the transaction – it describes what the buyer actually gets at the closing. But errors can be easily overlooked, and the resulting problems can be quite serious.

Legal description details to watch for:

Which Lot is being transferred?
The sellers might own two adjacent lots acquired in the same deed, but perhaps they built a new house on one and only want to sell the other one now. If it’s obvious that they own multiple parcels, it is imperative to confirm that the deal is to include all of them, and if not, make sure that the parties agree in advance as to which lots are intended to be included.

Does the description match what the seller intends to sell?
The sellers could have acquired the adjoining lot after they bought the home, or just a sliver of land because of a “lot line adjustment” with a neighbor dealing with an encroachment. Maybe a portion of the adjoining street or alley was vacated. But if the purchase and sale agreement only includes what was on the deed when the seller bought the house and that oversight isn’t caught, the buyer won’t get everything the seller intended to sell. Best to catch it now and not have to track down the seller later.

Lot line adjustments can be a problem.
It is important to make sure that the boundary is actually where the parties think it is, but also to make sure it’s reflected in amended tax parcels, subdivision maps and mortgages on both parcels. Most important, any boundary line agreement needs to include a mutual conveyance from each of the neighbors. It’s one thing to agree where the property line is, but another to make sure each has good title to the land on either side of that line – and then make sure the purchase agreement and deed agree.

Vacated Roads

Road vacation is the legal process of undoing a road creation. The vacated road ceases to be a
public road where the public has the right to travel. The vacated property usually reverts to the abutting owners up to the center of the road.

How are vacated roads handled in WA?
Vacated roads are especially important, because that land does not automatically pass with the sale of the adjoining main parcel if not described in the deed. In Washington vacated road must be expressly described in the deed.

Sale after foreclosure
Along these lines, if the house is being sold after a foreclosure it’s important to make sure the deed of trust and trustee’s deed included all the land the borrower acquired after taking out the loan.

We all know that the address is not itself a “legal description” and would not be sufficient in a deed. Nor should the address (and/or tax parcel) only be used in a purchase and sale agreement. In both cases a complete legal description is necessary. Otherwise it’s easy to overlook things such as the fact that the address might only apply to one of the lots owned by the seller.

Is a tax parcel sufficient as a legal description?
Tax parcels can be a trap. For example, where a lot line adjustment occurred the additional land might not have been included in the main tax parcel, or may have been assigned a new tax parcel number.

“It’s a good idea to visually check the property, and walk the property lines with the seller with a legal description in hand.”

Practical tips to use when purchasing a parcel

What Makes a Legal Description Legal?

Click the image above to download a printable version of this article.

It’s a good idea to visually check the property, and walk the property lines with the seller with a legal description in hand. Is there a vacant lot or a “greenbelt” next door? Does the yard look extra-large compared to other lots in the neighborhood? Is the driveway shared with a neighbor, or does it seem to go over the adjoining land? Does the garage or a shed in the back yard sit right on the line – or over it? Do all utilities come directly into the property from the street, or might some cross the neighbor’s land?

If property line issues arise they may cause a delay in closing, but if discovered early in the process by paying attention to the description and looking at the property they can usually be resolved quickly to everyone’s satisfaction.

For information on the types of legal descriptions, click the link below:

Real estate legal descriptions in WA

Questions or comments? Please share below!

Residential Title and Escrow Rate Calculator – TicorRates.com

Online rate calculators for title and escrow services have become indispensable tools for loan originators over the last couple years.  Why?  Because a higher degree of accuracy is now required when loan originators disclose settlement fees to consumers on the Good Faith Estimate or GFE.  And with settlement fees falling into three tolerance categories it’s critical for loan originators to know that the fees quoted by the title insurance and escrow provider will be accurate and won’t change by more than 10%.

Calculate rates for your GFE instantly! Try out the free title and escrow rate calculator today! Click here to try it now at TicorRates.com!

Therefore as a service to our clients Ticor has created an easy to use, online rate calculator.  View the calculator at http://ticorrates.com to try it out today!

TicorRates.com benefits:

  • It’s easy to use
  • 24/7 availablility
  • No need to log in
  • Calculate Fees in under a Minute
  • Quotes are valid for 60 Days

Here’s a 2-minute video tour of TicorRates.com
Click on the play button below to watch it now.

Unable to display content. Adobe Flash is required.

A quick review of the GFE and HUD-1 Settlement Statement Changes

Last year significant changes were made to RESPA’s two primary disclosure forms (GFE and HUD-1 Settlement Statement) for the purpose of ensuring more timely and effective disclosures of the settlement costs of residential mortgage loans. One of the major changes was the addition of a third page to the HUD-1 which facilitates a side-by-side comparison of the settlement charges listed on the Good Faith Estimate vs. actual charges on the HUD-1 settlement statement.  In addition, the new HUD-1 makes it easier for lenders and settlement agents to identify tolerance violations with the settlement charges.

Charges that cannot increase on the HUD-1 Settlement Statement

  • Origination charge
  • Credit Charge
  • Adjusted origination charge
  • Transfer taxes

Charges that cannot increase in total by more than 10% on the HUD-1 Settlement Statement

  • Recording fees
  • Title Services
  • Any other required services that are provided by a company identified by the loan originator

Charges that can increase on the HUD-1 Settlement Statement:

  • The initial escrow deposit
  • Daily interest charges
  • Homeowner’s insurance
  • Any required services consumers purchase from providers not identified by the loan originator

What do you think? Is this calculator a time saver for your business?

Please share by commenting below!

Is Title Insurance Worth It? Fraud Victims Covered…

A senior escrow officer at one of our sister companies recently purchased an investment property for all-cash with her brother. After closing, they renovated the property and found tenants who would sign a long-term lease. Six months later, the property was foreclosed upon by Bank of America and the escrow officer and her brother almost lost their investment!

Title Insurance Claim Story

Fortunately for the escrow officer and her brother, they purchased title insurance at closing. They immediately notified the claims department of their loss. The claims officer began researching how the buyers could have lost the property to foreclosure when they had not mortgaged the property in the first place.

A Shell Game Indeed…
What he found was shocking. In 2010 the original owners fell on hard times and stopped making payments to Bank of America on both their mortgage and Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) as evidenced by more than one recorded Notice of Default in public records. Shortly thereafter the owners recorded a Substitution of Trustee and Deed of Reconveyance for each loan. These documents purportedly released the two Bank of America loans. They were supposedly signed by an authorized representative of BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP, but were not signed in the home office of Bank of America. Instead these two releases were signed, according to the notary, in Placer County, Calif.

Next, the property owners deeded their (now free and clear) piece of property to a company, called Atlus Equity, LLC, which subsequently listed and sold the property to our escrow officer and her brother for $190,000. The tenants living in the property received Notice of Trustee’s Sale and stopped making their monthly rent payments to save for an impending move once the foreclosure occurred.

“The claims department is standing by to write the check to Bank of America in exchange for their deed.”

In the meantime, the escrow officer and her brother have been working with the claims officer to settle with Bank of America to deed the property back to them. The Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale states the bank is due $189,000. The claims department is standing by to write the check to Bank of America in exchange for their deed.

Sadly, after a search in the claims system, we have discovered this same scam has been pulled by the same individuals at least five times leading up to this claim.

Moral Of The Story
There are specific elements that we are cautious of when examining title for free and clear property. Specifically, we investigate the event that led to mortgages being paid in full and review recorded lien releases and investigate their authenticity if they appear to be executed outside of the main lender office.

What do you think? Is title insurance worth it? Please share your thoughts by commenting below.

Top 4 Domestic Partnership Questions

A domestic partnership is a legal relationship between two adults who are not married. The status confers many of the rights and benefits also available to married couples in many aspects of life but it is not marriage under Washington law. Originally only a few of these affected real property, but as of 2008 many elements of real property ownership applicable to married persons now also apply to domestic partnerships.

1. Who qualifies for domestic partnership?

How does domestic partnership affect real estate ownershipDomestic partnerships can apply to persons of the same sex, but also to those of the opposite sex where at least one of them is 62 years old or older. This is important to those who want some of the benefits of marriage but who do not want to be married. For instance, a domestic partnership will allow inheritance of a home as if the couple were married, but preserve the single status of those persons who do not want the relationship to affect, for example, pensions or Social Security benefits. For those couples it is important that the legal relationship not be equivalent to marriage.

“Domestic partnerships can apply to persons of the same sex, but also to those of the opposite sex where at least one of them is 62 years old or older.”

2. How do domestic partnerships effect real estate ownership?

Broadening the treatment of real property to apply to domestic partnerships means that now interest in real property is equivalent to both homestead and community property for a married couple. (Please see previous post on community property & homesteads in WA by clicking here.) And, of course, if either partner dies without a will, title to real property will be treated the same as for a married couple in similar circumstances. (Please see May 2011 post regarding probates.)

3. How can I have a domestic partnership legally recognized?

In order for the domestic partnership to be legally recognized in Washington State a declaration of domestic partnership must be completed and filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, Corporations Division. It can be terminated automatically if the partners marry each other as recognized in Washington (which would only apply to domestic partners of the opposite sex). It can also be terminated voluntarily by filing a notice and affidavit with the registry and meeting certain other criteria. The final way it can be dissolved is by a court process similar to marriage dissolution.

4. Will Washington State recognize a same-sex marriage registered in another state?

Limited reciprocity rules apply to domestic partnerships. A legal union formed in another state that is “substantially equivalent” to a Washington domestic partnership will be recognized here as such. However, a same-sex marriage that is legal in another state is not recognized in Washington as either a marriage or a domestic partnership.

Washington State Domestic Partnership Resources:

Domestic Partnerships – WA State
Frequently Asked Questions
Domestic Partnership Declaration.pdf

Questions or comments? Please respond by leaving a message in the comment box below!

Fraudulent Mechanic’s Liens Thwarted

Unfortunately, REO properties are a prime target for fraudulent Mechanic’s Liens, since it is not uncommon they might need some repairs or work done and since there are so many different people involved in rehabilitating foreclosed properties for eventual resale.

Mechanics Lien Fraud

A fraudulent mechanics lien was filed repeatedly against bank owned properties.

Fool me Once…
One of our sister companies had a sale transaction wherein Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) was the seller as the property was an REO bank owned property. The title report reflected a Mechanic’s Lien payable to Anna Moskovyan for painting. Moskovyan was contacted for a payoff statement and lien release. The payoff amount was shown on the settlement statement, however, FNMA stated they were not aware of any work being performed on the property by Moskovyan. Since this transaction was so close to closing, FNMA approved the payment and did not dispute the invoice or lien. Moskovyan came to our offices and picked up her check in exchange for a release of her lien.

Something’s Fishy…
Shortly afterwards an officer, Paula, from another sister company noticed Mechanic’s Liens appearing on all the title reports wherein FNMA was the seller. Paula did some further investigation and discovered, upon closer examination, it appeared the lien was exactly the same – simply recorded over and over again against different REO properties owned by FNMA. This is when the following warning was sent to her co-workers:

Mechanic’s Liens were recorded on FNMA properties in our area. The exact same lien, for the exact same amount, for the exact same service, was found recorded against several properties. We’ve checked with FNMA and the Listing Agent and this woman who signed this Mechanic’s Lien had not been contracted with to provide any services; the properties in question were not painted and were never scheduled to be painted. If you receive a title report or a supplemental report with a Mechanic’s Lien, let us know immediately so that we can get this addressed before you try to record. The agent in this particular case has had six of his FNMA listed properties compromised in this manner, and he has no idea who this person is.

We are not sure how wide-spread this is and whether it has gone to surrounding counties, however, it will likely disrupt recordings in our area for a while, and we need to keep our eyes open for them.

Once our offices confirmed FNMA had not contracted with Moskovyan to perform work on its properties, the operations obtained an indemnity on each transaction in which a fraudulent Mechanic’s Lien was filed with the county recorder and proceeding to close without paying the lien holder. The listing agent reported the fraudulent liens to the police department, and a case number was assigned.

Be Aware
If this lien or similar liens appear on your title report, do not take the lien at face value. Do some investigating and contact the seller and listing agent to make sure any lien affecting a property is, in fact, a true lien and not fraudulent. This could end up saving the customer and Our Company from a potential lawsuit.

The sad part of this tale is how it illustrates anyone can take a document to the County Recorder’s office, pay the appropriate recording fee and have it recorded against any property. The county does not check for validity of a lien, just that the document is in the proper format. The integrity of our public records system is broken down with every fraudulent document recorded. This only emphasizes the importance of title insurance and what a vital role Our Company plays in the American dream of home ownership.

Questions or comments? Please leave a share below!

Domestic Partnership Law in Washington State

Domestic Partnership Law in Washington State took effect  Thursday, June 12, 2008.  This law does not create a legal relationship that is equivalent to marriage, but does create property rights that previously applied only to married persons.

Domestic Parnerships Washington

Domestic Partnership Law in Washington State

Who can enter into a Domestic Partnership?
Two people of the same sex of any age over 18 and capable of consent or two people of the opposite sex, at least one of whom is over 62 years of age.

Almost every statute that addresses rights of married persons relating to real property has been amended to also apply to State Registered Domestic Partners.

This includes:

  • Community property rights including automatic presumptive community interests
  • Homestead rights
  • Inheritance rights
  • Dissolution in Superior Court

Domestic Partnerships are established in Washington by simply filing with the Washington Secretary of State’s Office.

Useful links:

DomesticPartnerships
Frequently Asked Questions
Domestic Partnership Declaration.pdf

More Resources:
Seattle City Clerk’s Office – The City of Seattle’s Domestic Partnership Registration program allows unmarried couples in committed, on-going family relationships to document their relationships. Couples may consist of a man and a woman, two men, or two women.

Domestic Partnership Registration is voluntary, and does not create any new or different legal rights or responsibilities, or any contractual relationships or obligations between those registered.
http://www.seattle.gov/leg/clerk/dpr.htm

$1.5M Foreclosure Fraud Scheme Busted

During a routine title exam, Lisa H. uncovered a forged quit claim deed. After a more thorough investigation, Lisa discovered the deed was one of many recorded by two brothers who were recently charged with a $1.5 million fraud scheme.

Foreclosure Fraud Lisa works for one of our sister companies as a title examiner. She was examining the chain of title for a residential sale of property in San Bernardino County, Calif. with a $350,000 sale price when she came across a deed she was sure was forged.

These were the signs that made her question the deed:

  • To avoid the payment of transfer tax, the transfer was declared a “gift” on the face of the deed
  • It was an uninsured deed and not recorded by a title company
  • The deed was handwritten
  • The handwriting matched the signatures on the document, including the signature of the notary
  • The notary stamp reflected the notary’s last name as “Desahagun” however the notary clearly signed his name as “Deshagun”
  • The notary’s name was listed on the office postings as a suspect and all documents containing the notary’s stamp should be scrutinized
  • The grantor’s signature did not match signed documents recorded previously in the chain of title
  • The “when recorded mail to” name and address was neither the grantor’s nor the grantee’s
  • Lisa ran a search on the grantee’s name, David Zepeda, and found approximately 70 other properties in which he was suddenly the owner

Lisa brought the deed to the attention of the advisory title officer and together they called the escrow officer to provide their detailed findings and to notify the escrow officer our underwriters would not be issuing a policy for this transaction. The escrow officer in turn called the property owner to find out if he in fact executed the handwritten deed. It turns out he did not. Lisa was right, the deed was a complete forgery and the true owner stated he had no intentions of selling his property.

The property owner then reported the incident to the District Attorney’s office. As it turned out, he was not the only victim of David Zepeda. The District Attorney’s office confirmed that David Zepeda and his brother, John Zepeda, were being investigated as part of a ring of suspects involved in a foreclosure scheme known as the David Zepeda Trustee Foreclosure scam, which so far has claimed hundreds of victims.

This story is an excerpt from our parent company’s Fraud Insights newsletter.  To read the entire article, click here.

A Proactive Approach at Ticor Title Northwest
Our seasoned Title Officers, Examiners, Escrow Officers, and Escrow closers in Ticor’s Puget Sound operation are trained to operate with the highest standards of conduct.  We are proactive in our efforts to identify potentially fraudulent activity in any transaction.

Questions or comments?  Please share by leaving a comment below!

 

Water Boundaries & Title Insurance

waterfront boundaries and title insurance
The Realtor® has a great listing – it’s beautiful beachfront property. But, the buyer wants to know what she actually gets for the premium price. Is the beach hers? Can anyone else walk along the beach in front of her house? Can she put in a dock for her boat? If the beach starts to erode can she put it something to stop it? Will the title company guarantee her rights to the beach?

tipTip: Click the keyword links in this post to view the definition of the keyword (i.e. click on: navigable waters). Click the link again to hide the definition.

There are three main areas of concern to the buyer

  • The first is title – that is, who owns the beach?
  • The second is the location of the boundaries – how far out does the owner’s title extend, where is the boundary between the upland and the beach, and does the upland boundary extend straight out into the water?
  • The third is use – what can the owner or others do on the beach or the water?

These waterfront issues are complicated, and the Realtor® should never assume anything about who owns what and what rights the upland owner has to use or control use of the beach.

Who owns the beach?
On navigable waters on Puget Sound, the title company will only insure land that was deeded by the State. But for non-navigable lakes or streams all upland owners would own not only the “beach” but also the submerged land out to the center. But then, where is the location of the side boundaries that extend out into the water? If a dock is built, how can the upland owner know if it extends over the line? That issue will likely require a survey that will satisfy both owners.

What use can be made of the beach or the water?
A waterfront owner has riparian rights to use the water but so do all the other upland owners. None could, for example, dam a stream to create a pond or re-route the course of a stream or dredge or add fill to a lake. Water itself is not owned privately – it’s a natural resource, so the public can often also use the water.

Also, the state or federal government has broad regulatory authority under the public trust doctrine affecting both the water and the uplands to the extent it is necessary to protect water quality, fishing resources and public commerce. So a bulkhead intended to preserve upland property, or a dock into the water or even a house on the uplands can be regulated or prohibited altogether.

“A waterfront owner may be out of luck if there are changes to the course of a stream that eliminate access to it.”

And nature will take it’s course…
It’s also important to note that nature can impact title to the land. For example, a waterfront owner may be out of luck if there are changes to the course of a stream that eliminate access to it. More importantly, if a stream is the boundary, owners on both sides might either gain or lose land. If the change is sudden (a man-made or natural mudslide, for example) title won’t change, but the land may be high and dry with no access rights. But, if it happens gradually over a long time period, the boundary line might also move – meaning one of the owners gains land and the other one loses land, but water access would remain for both.

water boundaries and title insurance

The title company will only affirmatively insure title and boundaries of waterfront land to the extent they’ve been established of record, and if not, will take exceptions to such matters. And, no use rights will be insured. Instead, exceptions for possible rights of other riparian owners or the public will be in the title policy.

Have you dealt with a water boundary concern on a real estate transaction?
Please share by leaving a comment below!

Yours, Mine & Ours… Homesteads in Washington State

John and Jane Dough just got married and put in an offer on a house, but John’s credit isn’t too hot. As it happens, Jane has good credit, so Jane plans to buy it in her name alone. But, the bank still wants him to sign as well.

American Gothic

Can’t it be her separate property?

The answer is yes – but that’s not the issue for the bank. Washington has two separate statutes dealing with who must sign a Deed of Trust – one deals with community property and the other applies to homestead property.

  • Community property is acquired after marriage or after registration of a state registered domestic partnership and is jointly owned.
  • A homestead is where the couple lives or intends to live and it’s automatic (RCW 6.13.040).

Jane can own the property as her separate estate and in that case John wouldn’t need to sign the Deed of Trust – unless it is or will be their homestead. That’s where the other statute comes into play. RCW 6.13.060 requires both spouses to execute a Deed of Trust (and a deed for that matter) of their homestead, or else it isn’t a valid lien. It makes no difference if it’s separate property of one spouse. So, the bank isn’t asking John to sign in order to encumber any title he has – he doesn’t have any – but rather to encumber his statutory homestead rights in that property.

More importantly, if John doesn’t sign the Deed of Trust the bank would not even have a valid lien on Jane’s interest.

“The homestead of a spouse or domestic partner cannot be…encumbered unless the instrument…is executed and acknowledged by both spouses or domestic partners…”

John’s credit isn’t good – the house can be Jane’s separate property – John still has to sign. How is all this resolved? Well, typically the bank won’t insist that John be on the title, and won’t have him sign the note – thus avoiding using his credit. He just needs to sign the Deed of Trust.

Oh, by the way, the borrowing spouse can execute the Deed of Trust on behalf of the non-owning spouse using a power of attorney. In Washington, RCW 6.13.060 specifically allows this.

Yours, Mine & Ours Review Points:

  • Community Property is property acquired after marriage or registration of a state registered domestic partnership
  • Homestead is where a couple lives or intends to live (RCW 6.13.040)
  • A spouse or partner can own separate property, but if the property is a homestead both husband and wife or partners must execute a deed of trust; otherwise it is an invalid lien (RCW 6.13.060)

Ticor Title Company Fact Sheet 1Q 2011

We don’t like to boast, but occasionally we like to remind our clients of the financial strength behind our brand. If your real estate title is insured with Ticor, you’re on solid ground. Below is a press release from our parent company FNF for 1Q 2011.

Ticor Title is a member of the Fidelity National Financial family of companies, which is a leading provider of title insurance, mortgage services, specialty insurance and information services, and is the nation’s largest title insurance company through its title insurance underwriters. Collectively, Ticor Title and the FNF underwriters issue more title insurance policies than any other title company in the United States.

The first quarter of 2011 represented our strongest quarter in a number of years, as our direct operations benefited from strong refinance closings early in the quarter and consistent closings throughout February and March.

Another contributing factor was the continued robust nature of our commercial title business, which saw revenue grow by 35% over the first quarter of 2010. We are encouraged by the strong start to the year in the commercial business and based on our pipelines, are becoming more and more confident that the commercial market will continue to yield positive results in 2011.

We always work hard to maintain industry-leading margins even in the face of cyclical headwinds, and this quarter is a reflection of our success with those efforts. The loyalty of our clients, the diligent effort of our employees to be the best in the industry, and the commitment of our local managers to provide decisive leadership in their respective markets significantly positions FNF for a strong 2011.